Clinic-based testing validated against existing & competing technologies
Intraclass correlations: MD = 0.93, PD = 0.86.
Kong et al TVST 2016
Tiang et al Frontiers Ophthalmol 2025.
VitaNext more repeatable than HFA SITA-Fast & similar to HFA SITA-Standard (over 6 month period).
Prea et al Am J Ophthalmol. 2018
Scored highest in ease of use & testing speed in user experience rating compared against VR goggles and Eyeonic online perimeter.
Cheng, Jain et al. Optometry Connection 2024.
Over 170 patients tested. Strong Test-retest repeatability ICC =0.99
Sugihara et al TVST Under review
Sugihara et al Journal of Glaucoma Under review
Over 119 patients tested. HFA-SITA standard vs 24-2 Rapid MD ICC=0.96
Sugihara et al Under review
High performance of MRF compared to HFA in Hindi & Chinese speaking populations.
97% agree with ease of use and 61% would consider using MRF at home
Bhartiya et al. Under Review
Cheng et al TVST Under Review
First large-scale home monitoring trials for glaucoma and AMD made possible with the software, both published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Prea et al. Am J Ophthal 2021
Prea et al. Am J Ophthal 2022
Strong association for Mean deviation (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) and moderate association for Pattern Deviation (r = 0.61; P < 0.001) between MRF and HFA in patients with glaucoma.
Prince J, Thompson A, Mwanza JC, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Budenz DL. Glaucoma Screening Using an iPad-Based Visual Field Test in a West African Population. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. May-Jun 2022;5(3):275-283. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.09.002
In detection of mild and moderate field defects (Area Under ROC of 0.81 and 0.87, respectively).
Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, et al. Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2021;15(3):125-131.
Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma
Joyce Tiang, Algis J. Vingrys,Sarah Lin, Selwyn M. Prea, Adam Ahmed Moktar, Allan Bank, Ashish Agar, Yu Xiang George Kong
Front. Ophthalmol. , 06 February 2025
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ophthalmology/articles/10.3389/fopht.2025.1485950/full
Comparative Analysis of Melbourne Rapid Fields Web-Browser Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Chinese Glaucoma Patients
De-Fu Chen; Wenzhe Zhou; Xiaonan Lu; Tao Wang; Chenmin Wang; Yaoyao Wang; Yu Xiang George Kong; Algis J. Vingrys; Cong Ye; Yuanbo Liang
Translation Vision Science and Technology TVST. 2025;
https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2810437
Persistent visual impairments following mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke
Wijesundera C, Crewther SG, Wijeratne T, Vingrys AJ.
Front Ophthalmology. 2025; Volume 5 � 2025, https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2025.1505836
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ophthalmology/articles/10.3389/fopht.2025.1505836/full
Acceptance of innovative perimetry methods in Germany Virtual reality spectacle perimetry and tablet-based perimetry in glaucoma patients (German)
Silvia Andreea Schrittenlocher , Vincent Lke , Hanne Irle , Jithmi Weliwitage , Jan Niklas Lke , George Kong , Algis J. Vingrys , Alexandra Lappas , Claus Cursiefen , Thomas S Dietlein
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd (Klin Monbl Ophthalmology). 07 January 2025
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2511-4087
Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients.
Prea SM, Vingrys AJ, Kong YXG.
J Clin Med . 2022 Jul 25;11(15):4317.
Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Joyce Kang, BA Sofia De Arrigunaga, MD, MPH Sandra E. Freeman, BA Yan Zhao, MS Michael Lin, MD Daniel L. Liebman, MD Ana M. Roldan, MD Julia A. Kim, BS Dolly S. Chang, MD, PhD David S. Friedman, MD, PhD Tobias Elze, PhD
Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2023
https://www.ophthalmologyglaucoma.org/article/S2589-4196(23)00059-5/fulltext
Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet
Viney Gupta; George X. Y. Kong; Abhishek Singh; Arnav Panigrahi; Shikha Gupta; Selwyn Prea; Algis J. Vingrys
Translational Vision Science & Technology May 2024, Vol.13, 10.
https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2793661
Evaluation of the Melbourne Rapid Fields Test Procedure.
Paul Alan Harris, Chris A Johnson, Yuan Chen , Hannah Fann , Gabrielle Gafford, Ye Ji Kim, Ellilta D Mezgebu
Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Apr 1;99(4):372-382.
Uptake, persistence, and performance of weekly home monitoring of visual field in a large cohort of patients with glaucoma.
Prea SM, Kong YXG, Guymer R, Vingrys AJ.
American Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2020
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939420306280
The short-term compliance and concordance to in clinic testing for tablet-based home monitoring in age-related macular degeneration.
Prea SM, Kong YXG, Guymer R, Sharangan P, Baglin E, Vingrys AJ.
American Journal of Ophthalmology Sep 2021
A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
Yu Xiang George Kong; Mingguang He; Jonathan G. Crowston; Algis J. Vingrys
Translational Vision Science & Technology. November 2016, Vol.5, 2.
https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2580184
Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?
Anderson AJ, Bedggood PA, George Kong YX, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ.
Ophthalmology 2017
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0161-6420(17)30896-5
Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyser.
Prea SM, Kong YXG, Mehta A, He M, Crowston JG, Gupta V, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 14.
Participant Experience Using Novel Perimetry Tests to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
Freeman SE, De Arrigunaga S, Kang J, Zhao Y, Roldn AM, Lin MM, Elze T, Liebman D, Chang DS, Friedman DS.
J Glaucoma. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):948-953.
Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad
Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, Vingrys AJ, Hepschke J, Kong GY, Turner AW.
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2021 Sep-Dec;15(3):125-131.
Performance of a Smart Device over 12-Months for Home Monitoring of Patients with Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Prea S, Guymer R, Kong G, Vingrys A.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):2530.
Glaucoma Screening using an ipad-based visual field test in a West African population.
Prince J, Thompson A, Mwanza J, Tolleson-Reinehard S, Bedenz DL
Ophthalmology Glaucoma
https://www.ophthalmologyglaucoma.org/article/S2589-4196(21)00206-4/fulltext
Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
Kumar H, Thulasidas M.
Journal of Ophthalmology
Scaling the size of perimetric stimuli reduces variability and returns constant thresholds across the visual field.
Bedggood P, Prea SM, Kong YXG, Vingrys AJ.
Journal of Vision 21(11):2
Visual field testing in the era of portable consumer technology
Kong YXG
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2018 Jun 12.
Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls
Angela M Schulz PhD, Elizabeth C Graham BMus, YuYi You PhD, Alexander Klistorner MD PhD, Stuart L Graham FRANZCO PhD
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 2017
Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
Algis J. Vingrys; Jessica K. Healey; Sheryl Liew; Veera Saharinen; Michael Tran; William Wu; George Y. X. Kong
Translational Vision Science & Technology July 2016, Vol.5, 3.
https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2534339
Tablets at the Bedside: iPad-based Visual Field Test used in the diagnosis of Intrasellar Haemangiopericytoma
Nisha Nesaratnam, Peter Thomas, R Kirollos, Algis J Vingrys, Yu Xiang George Kong, Keith R Martin.
BMC Ophthalmology 2017
https://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12886-017-0445-z
Acquired Visual Deficits Independent of Lesion Site in Acute Stroke
Chamini Wijesundera, Algis J. Vingrys, Tissa Wijeratne and Sheila G. Crewther
Front. Neurol., 17 July 2020
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.00705/full
Vision Testing Essential to Stroke Evaluation, Study Finds
Vision Testing Essential to Stroke Evaluation, Study Finds
Chamini Wijesundera, Algis J. Vingrys, Tissa Wijeratne and Sheila G. Crewther
Minews: Issue 184, Nov 22.
https://mivision.com.au/2022/11/vision-testing-essential-to-stroke-evaluation-study-finds/
Get in touch
